Видео

This guy can talk my ears off and I'd be completely fine with it

He’s so fucking smug when he reads Frankle like it was some Columbo gotcha moment.

Peter was a fantastic man. Todd is a pathetic person. This is low

D’souza has not only one of the most irritating voices of all time, he also talks utter nonsense whilst trying to sound intelligent by using long words. He’s not fooling anyone. Hitch is on a completely different level - frankly is a mauling and embarrassing. Hitch was an absolute treasure to humanity. I miss him.

Oh to have had Christopher Hitchin vs Jordan Peterson debate...

Gotta hand it to Wilson, it's not every man who's willing to go before a room full of people and admit that they're an unreasonable person.

“You probably know Hellen Keller, who was blind, deaf, and dumb”

Still have

Jesus, how I miss him..!

They have no chance up against Hitch and fry . Two not only extremely intelligent men but gentle human beings.to add to that the argument is dead in the water from the start. A vile bunch of backward Nazis who hate more readily than they breath . We muss you sir rest easy , thank you for your life among us all .

When I went to college and I was stressed out... " click "

we miss u Hitch

Such a privilege to have been second row centre at this event. Hitch was on fire that night.

All babies are born atheist.

Hillary’s life has been scrutinized for years, 11 hours of questioning over Bengali, every opportunity to examine her when she was First Lady, when she was Secretary of State and confronted Putin aggressively face to face. I never hear whatever most of American has decided makes her an unsuitable presidential candidate. Her biggest short coming is she is a woman. America could not come to terms with that. Other things that added to Trumps success was Comeys unexplainable decision to make this announcement. “While there is nothing chargeable on her emails we thought you should know FBI looked.” Plus there is no mention of the actions Putin took to affect our election. And all the Russian connections to Trump are never talked about. We ended up with Trump. And we may again. I am an old woman. The immaturity these guys display is concerning. Do not misunderstand. I support Sam Harris. He is a voice of sanity in our very troubled state of mind in America. And a vote for JFK is a vote for Trump! Scary!

Awful Al could give a shit about GOD other than it pays his bills.

Words fail me as to why Hitch would grace a stage with this conman.

Im sure Al Sharpton is a very nice man but that was the intellectual equivalent of watching Mike Tyson in the ring with Betty White.

Just word salad bullshit from the religious as usual. Says a lot while saying nothing at all…..

It’s like watching an old movie this Sam Harris having a brick size cell phone pretending to be sophisticated modern. It’s so pathetic.

The wisdom of Sam Harris didn’t aged well if you see the video on 2024 after witnessing the debacle of the liberal western world.

This Australian interviewer, like most people on that god forsaken island, does not possess the intelligence, worldliness, education, insight, or philosophical grounding to understand a third of this man's brilliance.

The Rev's like I NEED A DRINK BAD Y'ALL

He saved my mind after my nervous breakdown from spiritual abuse. Thank you wherever you are

Why be a sheep or any type of flock 😊 Totalitarian be a surftom of the pattern seeking mammal.

Sharpton is engaging in two fallacies: a non-sequitur fallacy and an argument from ignorance fallacy. First, a non-sequitur is when a person makes a claim and then skips to a conclusion without using evidence to link the claim and conclusion together. For example, a theist will say "The world exists, therefore it had to have been created by God." They cannot demonstrate that a God came down from above and created the world. They can make claims it happened and conclude it happened, but it's non-demonstrable. Second, an argument from ignorance fallacy is when someone asserts that just because something is not currently explained by science, that it must be attributed to a supernatural cause. Basically, the person who is making the claim who carries the burden of proof is wrongly shifting the burden of proof on to the person when they have no evidence to verify their claim. Fallacies are antithetical to truth. Thereby, Sharpton's position is based on a logical fallacy that presents illogical argument with no evidence.

It think the title of this video misrepresents the topic of the debate. It was not “What best explains reality?”, though Turek has ever since claimed that it was. It’s my understanding that the announced topic was “Does God exist?”. Unfortunately, the moderator failed to mention the topic of the debate in the recorded introduction. There is a huge difference between the two topics, since “Does God Exist” does not give Hitchens a burden of proof. If anyone has documentation showing the previously announced topic I’d like to see it.

Hitch somehow got Dembski to argue against himself

This comment section is largely an echo chamber of confirmation bias. Sharpton maintained a valid point throughout that Hitchens never addressed the actual argument. Hitchens embodies the true definition of sophistry in how he bumbles around the argument, meandering into one of his canned jokes about this or that Bible story which he recycles in each of his debates; ever evading the crux of the issue. While Hitchens is enjoyable to listen to from a rhetorical perspective, that is the sum total of his skill set which is to sound competent and convincing. When you pick apart his babbling, there is no coherency or consistency in his argumentation which I think should be obvious to any objective party but clearly is not to his fan-base.

1:10:29 Hahaha Hitch knows the quote by heart and leaves this guy for dead!

Can you please imagine if he was alive today

This was recorded in 2007. All I can say is that Hitchens seems as if he saw what is happening today. The religious right is trying to move our great nation toward theocracy.

Great introduction by Tony

In fairness Sam, I wonder how many hands went up at the Democratic debate?

So if i personally saw the Easter bunny you cant tell me nothing 🤣🤣 this was embarrassing

*Simple* If there were no promise of reward for being good, or no threat of eternal torture for being bad, NO ONE WOULD BE WORSHIPING. It's just scare tactics. Just be a good person.

1:03:00

54:39

Don't count your chickens before they're hatched.

Of all the debates, this one has the best challenge to Hitch. I do however, do and always will, take Hitch as the winner.

If broadcast with add breaks just buy space 🍒 pick subjects film a 1 - 2 min answer. 3 or 4 times during debate. Make em look like 🤡

And D'Sousa proves it

Catholic thought is a definite oxymoron

Mos def absolutely right

You will all bow to King Crocoduck!

I love how the audiance starts laughing right away as Mos Def is about to share his "expert opinions".

I am the product of education in the state of Tennessee where the word "evolution" couldn't be spoken. Luckily, I went to college, where evolution and other ideas were studied with joy. I also learned that I have four impacted wisdom teeth. Whyever would God put too many teeth in my jaw? Perhaps he miscounted.

This is almost unwatchable due to Shmuleys INCESSANT yelling. Christ almighty

Like a perfect symphony of rhetoric, it's just beautiful to listen to.

The part about social security is so right and of course abortions which is thankfully getting the attention it deserves.